save the planet and buy a car with two engines
under the hood of an F-150 hybrid
It all starts with the acceptance of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change ~ or for the less scientifically minded; man-made global warming. In fact it doesn’t, it really begins with car-hating Americans like Ralph Nader, and opportunistic fellow travelers like Al Gore. Californians, in particular, like the idea of there being less cars, and less polluting cars on their freeways. The snag is, in the USA you can’t go anywhere without driving there. (Unless you fly ~ and nobody would be insane enough to suggest a hybrid Boeing 757.)
So, smarter minds than the green, anti-car activists tried to come up with a solution. The first go-around were all-electric vehicles such as the Tesla, and apart from the hugely polluting batteries, that idea has some merit. Bigger engines, like a nuclear power plant, are more efficient than the smaller gas engines in the average Ford. The snag is, electric cars are useless; expensive, short ranged, and difficult to recharge, (time and place).
The solution to that one is to make the car recharge itself. We add an electric motor and batteries to an ‘ordinary’ petrol powered vehicle ~ and we have the New Bright Hope, the HYBRID. FFS!
Hybrid technologies are not new; they’ve been around for over a century. Petrol-electric, diesel-electric, even nuclear steam-turbine electric….. And they are good solutions for pressing engineering problems. But hybrid technologies are in no way ‘green’. In fact, hybrid technologies for mass-market road vehicles are far more polluting than just buying a small petrol-powered car.
Buy a hybrid and all you’ve done is buy a power-station on wheels.
all electric Tesla
mostly powered by fossil fuels